I have thought about doing postgraduate level study in Creative Writing on and off for several years. The points Smith makes in this article are very similar to the ones that regularly run through my head. It’s an interesting read so I’m reblogging it. Have a goo:
By Emily Smith:
During the Brooklyn Book Festival last September, my employers and I were invited to a gala hosted by the festival. I was making rounds when I met an MFA student studying at NYU, one who bore a shocking resemblance to the infamous @GuyInYourMFA Twitter account. He told me he was working on a novel.
“Like Catcher in the Rye,” he said, “but Holden Caulfield lives in Brooklyn.”
He was likely the type I had to compete with when I was accepted into Emerson’s MFA program this year. Unfortunately, I had to decline because I couldn’t afford to go without funding. There’s a number of think pieces as to why writers continue to invest in a degree that will saturate them in debt, but the answer seems pretty clear: the MFA is a literary calling card, a title not unlike Vanderbilt or Kennedy that can…
View original post 815 more words